One system, four roles
Hal is one system that reads your clients’ environments once, then plays whichever role the moment calls for.
Why it matters that Hal is one system
Four tools that each see a slice produce four partial answers and a person to reconcile them. One system that has read everything produces one answer.
That is not an architecture preference, it is the reason the alerts are worth reading. When a sign-in anomaly fires, the thing that decides whether it matters is context the SIEM does not have: whether that device is managed, whether there is an open ticket about it, whether the documentation says that user travels. Hal has all of it already, because the same system that watches the logs also read the RMM, the PSA and the documentation.
The same logs, the same context, the same Hal
The only thing that changes between the four roles is which question you are asking. There is no separate product to buy, no second console to learn, and no integration to maintain between them.

See what Hal surfaces on your own clients.
No deck. Ask us anything first. When you want to see Hal on your own tenants, we sign a short evaluation agreement and stand up your instance; you connect one tenant, Hal watches it for 14 days, and we walk you through what he found.
- 01You ask us your questions. No deck, no demo dataset.
- 02You sign a short evaluation agreement, and we stand up your own instance.
- 03You connect one tenant from your own admin console. Hal watches it for 14 days.
- 04We walk through what he found. Keep going month to month, or revoke the scopes yourself and stop.